religion


From Tom Ackerman (via Meteor Blades), an interesting concept:

I no longer recognize marriage. It’s a new thing I’m trying.

Turns out it’s fun.

Yesterday I called a woman’s spouse her boyfriend.

She says, correcting me, “He’s my husband,”
“Oh,” I say, “I no longer recognize marriage.”

The impact is obvious. I tried it on a man who has been in a relationship for years,

“How’s your longtime companion, Jill?”
“She’s my wife!”
“Yeah, well, my beliefs don’t recognize marriage.”

Fun. And instant, eyebrow-raising recognition. Suddenly the majority gets to feel what the minority feels. In a moment they feel what it’s like to have their relationship downgraded, and to have a much taken-for-granted right called into question because of another’s beliefs.

Just replace the words husband, wife, spouse, or fiancé with boyfriend, girlfriend, special friend, or longtime companion. There is a reason we needed stronger words for more serious relationships. We know it; now they can see it…

The rest of the piece is here. Thoughts?

Obama’s totally playin’ the media into thinking his VP pick is going to be Evan Bayh. I don’t think that’s going to be the case. Other names that have been thrown around from insiders and speculators include Kaine and Biden. Yeah, I too was like “who’s Kaine?” And Biden’s great on foreign policy and a number of other issues, but I just don’t think he’s going to be the one. However, all this back and forth thinking is just the game Obama’s playing, which i think is very smart. He controls the media in a much more positive way that Bush/Cheney/Rove do (where they feed the media B.S. that the media spews, causing us to go to war and kill hundreds of thousands and displace millions). But it’s getting a little tiring (I’d like the media to focus on bigger issues and just wait on the VP pick). Jay Rosen, a professor of journalism and media reformer expresses this exhaustion in two 140 character messages (the size of a message on the popular service Twitter):

Press: “We can find out who your VP is going to be before you announce it.” Obama: No you can’t. Can too! Cannot! On yeah? Yeah! Riveting.

Obama: “I can get the word out to and through my supporters.” Press: “Not if we find out first and tell them, you can’t! Dun-dun-dun!!

And today I received an email from Michael Moore’s mailing list — an open letter to Caroline Kennedy calling for her to be VP (she’s the chair of the obama VP search committee). Obama-Kennedy!

But now on dailykos, folks are joking around about what the TEXT message that Obama’s campaign sends out will be. (Obama sent out emails to his supporters offering to text message the name of his VP pick as soon as he announces his pick).

Some of the funny ones:

“Obama chooses Maddow, D-Reality, as his vice presidential running mate. To make a donation to the campaign, visit my.barackobama.com.”

Oh and Yay Rachel Maddow will now have her OWN SHOW on MSNBC! Woohoo! So absolutely excited, that woman is intelligent, witty, analytical, humble, and queer, yay for queer women in media! Ok back to the texts…

Love this one (lolcats style)!:

“OMG LOL CLARK BITCHEZ!!!1111!”

Many think Wesley Clark would be one of the strongest picks for VP.

On fundraising and suspense:

“I have chosen…. 2 C rst of msg, snd $40 2 mybarackobama.com. Thx!”

On more of obama:

“Obama/Obama ’08! I haz cloned self. Ur welcom!”

On ambiguity:

“”It’s Bayhden”

On twitter:

“hmm why doesn’t he just post it to twitter?”

My brother’s addition to the discussion:

“Barack Obama picks Wes Clark as his VP. McCain, you’ve been PWNED!”

American idol style (hilarious!):

“text to 688888

your choice

1 for Biden
2 for Feingold
3 for Kaine
4 for Gore”

Whatever the text message will be, I’m sure we’ll all be surprised (hopefully pleasantly). But honestly I do wish the media would cover a broader range of issues, you know like THE NEWS. Let we the people gossip about VP choices or what the contents of the most anticipated text message in history will contain.

Lastly — thousands (or more?) have signed up for this service, and when the announcement is made, the texts will stream in around the same time (off by seconds, perhaps by minutes depending on the load to the mobile services distributing the texts). I’m imagining a birds eye view of the scene at the moment people find out… more from a cultural/anthropological perspective than a gossip-spewing celebrity-adoring perspective. Wonder what that will look like…

Below is an excerpt from a beautiful reflection piece by my friend Taz. Check out the full post – God — the Policy Solution at her blog “Say What?”

The Muslim homeless couple. I know they were Muslim because the woman was wearing her head covered. They looked Arab, and in their 60s. Wrinkled and elder. This was the third time they had been at this corner. A couple of days ago they were across the street, but they had been at this corner for the past 24 hours. The first time I saw them, I almost tripped over the woman as I got out of the bus. It had been dark and I glanced down after the almost trip to see that she had a mini-grill as her source of heat. This morning I had a little more time to check out their interim home. The man was sitting on a sleeping bag, and they were flanked by two laundry carts full of their worldly goods. They had just finished their breakfast—the remnants of empty Coffee Bean cups and a canister with the Quaker Oats man was in front of them. The woman got up and started to reorganize her stuff. Out of her bundles, she pulled out a short broom and started sweeping the sidewalk in front of their belongs completely surrounded by graduate students waiting for the bus. As she swept, she had a pleasant look on her face. I wondered what could she be thinking and how she could manage to live on the streets and still maintain a pleasant look on her face. I wondered how strong of a woman she must be that under adversity, she is still able to maintain routine and create for herself a home. She glanced up. Our eyes met. She looked upon me kindly and I tentatively smiled at her. She went back to sweeping.

“…but that’s the way I feel, and I think a lot of Americans will feel that way.”

I’m late to come to read about this, but that was a line from CNN Headline News’ Glenn Beck interview with a newly elected muslim-american congressperson. I read the transcript of the interview, but the video is even better. Both are available at Media Matters. (as well as Glenn Beck’s contact information)

AND…Beck goes on to mention that it’s great that Somalian-Americans are going out to vote in newly elected Representative Keith Ellison’s neighborhood, but then trails off into something else. Perhaps he’s insinuating that Ellison won merely because of the Somali-American vote and that they’re all muslim terror loving people? I’d be scared too if i was in the mind of Glenn Beck.

How Glenn Beck is still on the air after this accusation is shocking. We really can be racist against Muslim americans in all kinds of new ways post-9/11.

From Lott: Bush barely mentioned Iraq in meeting with Senate Republicans, by CNN’s Ted Barrett:

WASHINGTON (CNN) — President Bush barely mentioned the war in Iraq when he met with Republican senators behind closed doors in the Capitol Thursday morning and was not asked about the course of the war, Sen. Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, said.

“No, none of that,” Lott told reporters after the session when asked if the Iraq war was discussed. “You’re the only ones who obsess on that. We don’t and the real people out in the real world don’t for the most part.”

Lott went on to say he has difficulty understanding the motivations behind the violence in Iraq.

“It’s hard for Americans, all of us, including me, to understand what’s wrong with these people,” he said. “Why do they kill people of other religions because of religion? Why do they hate the Israeli’s and despise their right to exist? Why do they hate each other? Why do Sunnis kill Shiites? How do they tell the difference? They all look the same to me.”

Wow. The mere fact that an actual Senator in the United States Senate can say this and not be ripped out of his post and shamed is infuriating. Iraq, torture, these are the moral issues of our time, these are the issues that a majority of Americans are so very concerned with right now.

Obviously this is not the first assasine, racist, anti-human rights, ignorant comment this dude has made, let alone actions he has taken, but FOLKS, Lott has been in Congress for THIRTY-THREE YEARS. This guy, and so many others in his position (white republican senators or congresspeople) are so out of touch with reality it’s bizarre. THIS is exactly why I’m so pissed at Dems in general (and looking for some good new blood in and outside of the party, at this point i’ll vote for anyone who has principals and has a track record, whether republican, democrat, green, libertarian, etc). We’ve had opportunity after opportunity (as if God herself handed them personally to us) to shame these racist, anti-human rights, anti-AMERICAN, war-mongering folks and we have done NOTHING in response (I’m talkin’ *we* as in the party of Dems, i’m not putting down the amazing work that so many individuals and organizations are doing).

How do we use these pieces of fodder to our advantage? Someone on another blog suggested taking these words or video and playing them on ads at election time to show that (many) republicans don’t actually care about the war, or that they don’t have a basic college education. Any other creative ideas? We need to capitalize on their bullshit while we can.

And to the rest of the world, I’m sorry that Lott thinks he can say things like “I think it’s hard for Americans, all of us, including me, to understand what’s wrong with these [Iraqi] people.” He didn’t speak for me, nor did he speak for the majority of the country. And he needs to go to high school, or college, wherever they teach world politics 101. Embarassing.

Ok, so much else to report on — hopefully I’ll get a few minutes to blog a bit over the weekend. I’ve got much to write about Ani Difranco in concert, Massive Attack in concert, a sweet new weekly spoken word event just blocks from my house, and a reportback from 1 year post hurricane katrina that I went to tonight (including exciting discussions on movement-building among brown and black people).

No, I’m not bald under the scarf

No, I’m not from that country

where women can’t drive cars

No, I would not like to defect

I’m already American

But thank you for offering

What else do you need to know

relevant to my buying insurance,

opening a bank account,

reserving a seat on a flight?

Yes, I speak English

Yes, I carry explosives

They’re called words

And if you don’t get up

Off your assumptions,

They’re going to blow you away.

Kahf, Mohja, Jusoor-read and other poems, pg 39

(re-posted from brownfemipower’s post on the Women of Color Blog)

The Person Behind the Muslim

By ANAR ALI
Published: June 10, 2006
Toronto

I WENT to a school in rural Alberta from sixth grade onward, and each year I had to endure the annual school rodeo. Most of the students at my school were avid 4-H members, so the rodeo was the highlight of their year. It was an opportunity for them to exhibit their award-winning cattle or show off their skills in events like barrel racing and bronco riding. In an effort to convert the few city slickers among us, the school also provided less challenging events like the greased pig race.

I wasn’t interested in participating. My parents owned a motel, not a farm; my skills were honed as a chambermaid, not a cowgirl. I told my teacher that I was Muslim and it was against my religion to touch a pig.

“I thought you just couldn’t eat them,” she said.

“No, I can’t have anything to do with them,” I retorted, knowing full well that I was stretching the truth.

When Mrs. Ritchie refused to excuse me from the rodeo, I took the matter up with my father, certain he would side with me, not because of religion, but for hygiene and safety reasons. (Only recently, he called me at 11 p.m. to let me know he wanted to install anti-slip strips in my bathtub.)

But I was wrong. My father insisted I join the rodeo, even bought me cowboy gear from Kmart. Each year I tried protesting, emphasizing my inability to a catch a pig (let alone drag it across the finish line) as proof that I was wasting my time. But none of that mattered to my father. He was keen for me (and my sisters) to participate in all things Canadian. He refused to let me eat the hot dogs at the rodeo barbecue, but I had to enter the greased pig race.

This battle portended the many I would have in the future — not only with my father, but also with myself on where to set the dial between assimilation and retaining my own culture. I grew up living between worlds, in the hyphenated spaces of Indo-Canadian, Tanzanian-Canadian, and Ismaili Muslim-Canadian. It was a fractured existence, and one that was often unsatisfying. I never belonged anywhere completely.

Meena Alexander, an Indian-born poet who has lived in Sudan and the United States, puts it eloquently: “I am, a woman cracked by multiple migrations. Uprooted so many times she can connect nothing with nothing.” But I did not want to live in the cracks; it was exhausting. I wanted to live in a place that held all my multiplicities.

After years of hard work (and 30 years in Canada), I finally arrived in a new geography. It wasn’t a physical space, although being in Toronto, a city made of many cultures, helps. But it was a cultural and psychological place, one that coalesced my identities into one and gave me a sense of home. I called this place Canadian.

Sept. 11 changed all that. So have subsequent acts of terrorism — or attempted acts of terrorism, like the ones authorities said were planned by the members of Islamic terrorist cells arrested here last week. These events have all, in one way or another, expelled me from my new home. It was dismantled; my Muslim identity was teased out like code from a DNA strand. One piece of code does not tell you the whole story, but it is the only one placed under the microscope for investigation.

This is all you are. Muslim Magnified…

After 9/11, I soon became used to the new rules: double-checking at borders, detentions at airports, suspicious glances on subways, especially if you are carrying a backpack. One memorable incident: I was detained for three hours en route from Calgary to Los Angeles when the South Asian Arts festival I was attending in 2004 was suspected of being a radical Muslim group. The festival’s name, Artwallah, is a play on words, a mix of the words “art” and “wallah.” Wallah is a Hindi-derived word that denotes a profession; examples include taxi-wallah and chai-wallah. The presence of (w)Allah in the festival name raised flags.

I had to do a lot of explaining. Something, as an immigrant or person of color, you get used to from a very young age. (Where are you from? What does your name mean?) After a thorough investigation and phone calls to England to confirm the whereabouts of an “evil person” with a name similar to mine — “Ali,” I reassured the officer, was akin to “Smith” — I was finally released.

Whether you want it or not, as a Muslim (secular and otherwise) you are automatically pulled into the debate on terrorism. Not that I don’t want to discuss it, I do. But I want to discuss it as a citizen, not just a Muslim.

As a Muslim, people expect you to be an expert, to have special inside knowledge on the topic. They want your opinion on the issue, your help in explaining and analyzing complex political issues, the history of Islam, the psychology of suicide bombers.

I have no sense of what motivates a terrorist (except maybe as a fiction writer, since it’s my job to enter the hearts and minds of characters). Terrorists and radical Islamists live in a different place from me, psychologically and culturally, even if they were raised in Canada just as I was. To better understand these young men and why they turn to violence as a means to an end, it might make more sense to ask someone who was a skinhead, a member of the Irish Republican Army, a Tamil Tiger, or a Weatherman.

If you asked me, I would have to speculate, as most people do, from the sidelines.

Anar Ali is the author of “Baby Khaki’s Wings,” a collection of short stories.

The piece above was written for the NY Times back in June, but I found it among my emails and had to repost it. A permanent link to the piece can be found here.

Merry belated christmas. Just came across a wonderful reflection piece by the Jesuit priest Father John Dear in New Mexico, where I want to move because the priests are so progressive. I’m not really religious, I was raised Hindu but consider myself more spiritual than anything else, but I really respected Father John Dear’s piece — some excerpts below:

[Jesus] grew up to become, in Gandhi’s words, “the greatest nonviolent resister in the history of the world,” and was subsequently executed by the empire for his insistence on justice…

Christmas demonstrates that God sides with the poor, becomes one with the poor, and walks among the poor. God does not side with the rulers, the rich or the powerful, but with the homeless, the hungry and the refugees. Christmas puts poverty front and center and demands that we work to abolish poverty itself so that every human being has food, clothing, housing, healthcare, education, employment and a lifetime of peace…

Christmas pushes us to stand on the margins of society, where we will find God. Christmas announces that every human being is a beloved son and daughter of the God of love. Every human life is beautiful in the eyes of God, since God has become one of us. From now on, we reject exclusivity, racism, sexism, and discrimination of any kind, and embrace everyone as equal. We stand on the margins with the excluded, the marginalized, the outsiders and outcasts. From there, we envision a new reconciled humanity…