technology for the masses


Check out this powerful and moving plea for healthy development and environmental justice, from Majora Carter — an inspiring and courageous activist and organizer in the South Bronx. This talk, entitled “Greening the Ghetto” was given at the TED conference in 2006.

“Environmental justice goes something like this: no community should be saddled with more environmental burdens, and less environmental benefits, than any other.”

Carter links unjust urban development to health problems, talks race, and discusses the potential and the imperative for Americans to move towards REAL and just sustainable development.

She ends with a bang, stating that communities affected by environmental injustices must be at the decision-making table regarding local and national strategies. Check it out in the video, here’s here ending paragraph, it is SO absolutely true, whether the issue is environmental justice, health care reform, city planning, or schools:

“I spoke to Mr [Al] Gore, the other day after breakfast. I asked him how environmental justice activists were going to be included in this new strategy. His response was a grant program. I don’t think he understood that I wasn’t asking for funding; I was making HIM an offer. What troubled me was that this top down approach is still around. Don’t get me wrong, we need money. But grassroots groups are needed at the table DURING the decision-making process. Of the 90 percent of the energy that Mr Gore reminded us that we waste everyday, don’t add wasting OUR energy, intelligence, and hard earned experience to that count.”

Below: Step 9 of the 10 steps a country takes as it moves towards fascism. The clip is from the forthcoming documentary The End of America, based on Naomi Wolf’s book and speaking engagements. Naomi Wolf = brilliant.

Also check out the official movie trailer at the official The End of America documentary website.

The sheer number of articles in mainstream press about the social networking platform “Twitter” are cause for nausea. (Twitter is a platform by which one can send out 140-character messages, known as tweets, to however many other people are following their page. Some call it “microblogging”).

I dig Twitter and I use it to share articles with friends, reflect on medicine and public health, and share thoughts / events / passions about Los Angeles and the world around me. I’ve learned a wealth of information and have been led to innovative web-based technologies regarding health, based on short communications on twitter. I follow folks on Twitter whose opinions and article-sharing I like, I receive feedback on questions I pose, and I have a healthy relationship with this kind of experimentation of newer models of information sharing and reflecting.

So back to these articles. Seriously? Aren’t there more important issues to cover in the world? Most pieces I’ve seen about Twitter proclaim it to be the Next Best Thing. It’s been placed on some grotesque pedestal, but then again, much of media is in the business of sensationalizing. But most recently the alt press site Alternet.org, a website I have much respect for and read regularly, featured a commentary on Twitter entitled, “Twitter Nation Has Arrived: How Scared Should we Be?” by Alexander Zaitchik. I didn’t expect Alternet to post a commentary like this. Not because it’s disapproving of twitter and attempts to make larger philosophical points. But because it’s so poorly written, not well fact-checked, and is FULL of spite. The seething hate emanates from the article in very non-subtle ways. And the assumptions are far-reaching and presumptuous.

In addition, his facts are not researched. For example, the author states that Twitter was based on Facebook’s status update model. Nope. Twitter was around for almost a year before Facebook started incorporating status updates into its model. One of several simple facts that the author had completely wrong.

The article makes some interesting anthropological points that I agree with (and I’m always interested in discussions about how we’re becoming post-human). He also reveals some of the silliness of Twitter (honestly I don’t always get why people share what they do, and oftentimes the TMI syndrome comes into play — Too Much Information about your personal life, I don’t care — but that’s easily remedied by not following that individual’s stream). But interspersed his otherwise interesting points are volcanoes of rage (ha! did I just say volcanoes of rage? awesome!) which dilute any point he’s trying to make. Anyway, here are some of the author’s rants that I thought i’d share: (more…)

Cure This, a project that a few of us started over a year ago, has experienced some slow but immensely beautiful growth. We’ve got some exciting plans for 2009, and they’ll be shared shortly (and we’ll eagerly be awaiting your thoughts on our thoughts), but first a quick look at the 3 newest posts in the ’09, head there to read them:

Moving and Remembering — by brownfemipower. An excerpt:

And how can women who are ready to do deeply intensive work on their muscles/body be supported emotionally and mentally through the many issues that work may bring up in them-without demonizing women who aren’t ready, feel no need to ever be ready, or whom this situation simply doesn’t apply to?


Why it’s Time II: second first same as the first
— by cameronpage. An excerpt:

So really, this story is for those who live in fear that single-payer healthcare will give us long waiting periods. Let’s be clear about it: we’ve already been given long waiting periods. The HMOs gave them to us. But what the HMOs giveth, we can taketh away. We just have to decideth to.

Obama chooses “shiny” Sanjay Gupta as Surgeon General — by los anjalis. An excerpt:

Clear conflicts of interest prevailed in Gupta’s discussion of the health care system. As a journalist, I’m sure he would have fact-checked better — if not nudged by CNN’s advertisers interests. I’d like our top doc in the White House to be conflict-of-interest free, in the name of restoring integrity to our public health system.

Head over to Cure This to check out the full posts! Please feel free to add constructive comments, we could use some more discussion at the site. It’s easy as 1-2-3 to set up an account. You can also write your own “diary” that’s posted on the right side of the page and folks can vote on it, recommend it, discuss it! As you take a look at Cure This, if you have suggestions for improving the site, please feel free to drop them here in the comments until we have a formal feedback process housed there. Lastly, please share the website with friends and colleagues. More to come for the ’09!

As always, so beautifully produced, a video by the Obama campaign about how to protect your vote. And as always, a wonderful mix of sound and voices and music and graphics. What struck me in this video was the calm and collectedness of the presentation. It’s an issue I or others can become so easily angered by. But I appreciate the rational presentation of the issue, and found the video educational and convincing. So, note to self…

Amy Goodman, world-reknown and widely respected journalist broadcaster of the show Democracy Now!, being arrested for ASKING the police why they were doing what they were doing.

Yes, a woman peacefully holding a flower, getting pepper sprayed. (thanks to BFP for the video)

Just two examples of the violent protesters being nicely moved away by our police state. If this doesn’t infuriate you then I don’t know how you can believe in a free America.

- – - – -

As the DNC and RNC created “Free Speech Zones” far from the actual conventions, and as police are now pulling out tasers, concussion grenades, and tear gas at peaceful protesters at the RNC in Twin Cities Minnesota, and as police horses are stampeding protesters, and as cameras and cellphones are being seized without reason, and as police in the twin cities in Minnesota are jailing some without reason and threatening others, and as a friend of mine is involved in the Northstar Collective (a group of medics and others who have been preparing for months to provide medical and psychological support for victims of the police during the RNC), and as I’m hearing about victims of tear gas streaming into the Northstar makeshift clinics, I don’t know what to think.

Protests SHOULD matter, but increasingly they don’t, and people are criminalized and made out to be america-hating anarchists for it. Folks around America should be enraged, but it’s a bit hard to when the media isn’t covering it (and the media who IS is being arrested for it) and when the convergence of Palin/McCain and RNC media and Hurricane Gustav are all occurring at the same time.

In any case, I’m really proud of the folks who are tirelessly covering it.

The ColdSnapLegal collective is live-twittering (short live-blog posts) about up to date arrests and civil rights violations occurring at the RNC protests. Check out their messages here. And check out their website here. Thank you so much ColdSnapLegal.

Here are some of their latest twitter posts:

Cops threatening to arrest everybody @ river walk – 300+ ppl inc. medics, legal observers, journalists, concertgoers, kids. Tear gas used.

Mass arrests on Jackson & 9th, including Democracy Now! journalists Amy Goodman, Sharif Abdel Kouddou, Nicole Salazar.

Ramsey Cty jail on lockdown – no lawyers allowed inside. St. Joseph hospital also on lockdown, denying people water.

Steady stream of folks with pepper spray injuries at the Northstar clinic; medic headed to jail with supplies soon.

2 medics arrested at 6th & Wall

7th & Jackson arrests at 30-40. Democracy Now! journalists among those arrested at Temperance. Lots of police brutality among these arrests.

Anti-capitalist bloc being tear gassed on Jackson by river.

Pepper spray, tear gas, rubber bullets, concussion grenades being used in more locations than we can write in one tweet right now.

Person tackled by 5 SPPD in riot gear for refusing a search. Media was present for this.

~300 people being stampeded by police horses on 2nd & Kellogg

Cops are getting ready to gas funk the war blockade at kellogg and wabasha. Legal observers needed there now.

Others reporting on this (because the mainstream media is late to it):

Firedoglake (with videos and up to date reports)

The Uptake

Amazing to see so many folks using YouTube, Qik video (upload from phone), Twitter, and other social networking means for the dissemination of this much-needed information.

Last I checked, I thought we were living in the free world, not Beijing…

Obama’s totally playin’ the media into thinking his VP pick is going to be Evan Bayh. I don’t think that’s going to be the case. Other names that have been thrown around from insiders and speculators include Kaine and Biden. Yeah, I too was like “who’s Kaine?” And Biden’s great on foreign policy and a number of other issues, but I just don’t think he’s going to be the one. However, all this back and forth thinking is just the game Obama’s playing, which i think is very smart. He controls the media in a much more positive way that Bush/Cheney/Rove do (where they feed the media B.S. that the media spews, causing us to go to war and kill hundreds of thousands and displace millions). But it’s getting a little tiring (I’d like the media to focus on bigger issues and just wait on the VP pick). Jay Rosen, a professor of journalism and media reformer expresses this exhaustion in two 140 character messages (the size of a message on the popular service Twitter):

Press: “We can find out who your VP is going to be before you announce it.” Obama: No you can’t. Can too! Cannot! On yeah? Yeah! Riveting.

Obama: “I can get the word out to and through my supporters.” Press: “Not if we find out first and tell them, you can’t! Dun-dun-dun!!

And today I received an email from Michael Moore’s mailing list — an open letter to Caroline Kennedy calling for her to be VP (she’s the chair of the obama VP search committee). Obama-Kennedy!

But now on dailykos, folks are joking around about what the TEXT message that Obama’s campaign sends out will be. (Obama sent out emails to his supporters offering to text message the name of his VP pick as soon as he announces his pick).

Some of the funny ones:

“Obama chooses Maddow, D-Reality, as his vice presidential running mate. To make a donation to the campaign, visit my.barackobama.com.”

Oh and Yay Rachel Maddow will now have her OWN SHOW on MSNBC! Woohoo! So absolutely excited, that woman is intelligent, witty, analytical, humble, and queer, yay for queer women in media! Ok back to the texts…

Love this one (lolcats style)!:

“OMG LOL CLARK BITCHEZ!!!1111!”

Many think Wesley Clark would be one of the strongest picks for VP.

On fundraising and suspense:

“I have chosen…. 2 C rst of msg, snd $40 2 mybarackobama.com. Thx!”

On more of obama:

“Obama/Obama ’08! I haz cloned self. Ur welcom!”

On ambiguity:

“”It’s Bayhden”

On twitter:

“hmm why doesn’t he just post it to twitter?”

My brother’s addition to the discussion:

“Barack Obama picks Wes Clark as his VP. McCain, you’ve been PWNED!”

American idol style (hilarious!):

“text to 688888

your choice

1 for Biden
2 for Feingold
3 for Kaine
4 for Gore”

Whatever the text message will be, I’m sure we’ll all be surprised (hopefully pleasantly). But honestly I do wish the media would cover a broader range of issues, you know like THE NEWS. Let we the people gossip about VP choices or what the contents of the most anticipated text message in history will contain.

Lastly — thousands (or more?) have signed up for this service, and when the announcement is made, the texts will stream in around the same time (off by seconds, perhaps by minutes depending on the load to the mobile services distributing the texts). I’m imagining a birds eye view of the scene at the moment people find out… more from a cultural/anthropological perspective than a gossip-spewing celebrity-adoring perspective. Wonder what that will look like…

Jay Smooth really makes me nod my head with these two lines:

“But as a general rule if you’re not the original target of an insult, you can’t be the one to reclaim it. And 9 times out of 10, if you’re not sure whether you should use it, you probably shouldn’t.”

Yep. That goes for white people wondering why blacks can use the word nigger and they can’t, that goes for people calling everything lame throwing around the word “ghetto”, that goes for folks throwing around the word “retard”, and so on and so forth. That doesn’t go for the word dude. Anyone can say dude :>

UPDATE: Eric Stoller, a man I respect greatly, corrected me in the comments. I didn’t check myself on using the word “lame” while discussing offensive connotations of other words. Oops. Will promptly take that word out of use in my vocabulary.

UPDATE #2: Kevin @ A Slant Truth shares a new meme inspired by Sylvia @ ProblemChylde — changing NO HOMO to SO HOMO. I’m enjoying using it so far. Try it yourself.

I think I’ve watched this video now 6 times in a row. And cried each time because it’s so damn funny. And as my brother shares, it gives us hope. Hope — that Obama can wipe the floors with McCain if it’s the two of them running against each other for President. It also contrasts the positive WE message of Obama against the cynical dottering i’mtakingyoutohellwithme McCain message (while giving us a taste of how out of touch McCain is with reality). Thank you, smattering of Los Angeles area comics, writers, and musicians, for putting this together.

The best line is the one at the end, “McCain 08: Like Hope, But Different.”

Watch it!

I present to you, the awe-inspiring and shock-and-awe-ing quotes from McCain speeches, featured in the video:

The work that we face in our time is great
in a time of war
and the terrible sacrifices it entails
the promise of a better future is not always clear
there’s gonna be other wars
I’m sorry to tell you there’s gonna be other wars
there’s gonna be a lot of combat wounds
and my friends it’s gonna be tough
and we’re gonna have a lot to do
That old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran?
Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb…
I’m still convinced that withdrawal means chaos
and if you think that things are bad now
if we withdraw–you ain’t seen nothing yet
was the war a good idea, worth the price in blood and treasure?
It was a good idea
President Bush talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years
Maybe a hundred, that’s fine with me
I don’t think Americans are concerned if we’re there for a hundred years, or a thousand years, or ten thousand years.

Compare these, my friends, with the video and lyrics from the song “Yes We Can”.

Have I mentioned how much I love creative folks making and freely distributing video?

The above is a small celebration of Women-of-Color feminism and bloggers. I’m blessed to be included in the prelim video that Sudy put together and know that there are many others more deserving of a place in this montage.

Sudy ends the video with this quote:

“Power is never given back. When it’s stolen, if you want it back, you have to take it.” – M. Caballero

The Republican Presidential CNN/YouTube debate is just around the corner (November 28th).  As with the Democratic Presidential debate hosted by CNN/YouTube, Americans are submitting videos of questions they have for the candidates. 

Above, the national leaders of the American Medical Student Association framed the healthcare debate with a well-crafted question for the candidates.  Friends, these are the future leaders of American organized medicine, and there are thousands of them, and thankfully, they’re progressive, patient-centered, and dedicated to the public health of America.

Hope comes in many forms, and this is just one of them…

(cross-posted at Cure This).

Matt Compton says so very much, in his post “Jena and the Internet”:

When the Jena 6 does make an appearance on progressive blogs today, it’s little more than a passing nod. Huffington Post has a blog post buried below the fold; ThinkProgress gives it a two-sentence news brief.Now, in the wake of the protests, the bloggers are a bit more talkative about Jena, and Ezra Klein is one of those who commented on the late-developing coverage, saying: “[The silence] is telling as to the tenuous relationship between the online left and what’s more traditionally been the left.”

But outside the major blogs, the Internet hasn’t been silent on this issue. On Facebook, there are more than 500 groups, with thousands of members, which reference Jena. On YouTube, there are more than 1,600 videos that mention the town, including this one — which has been seen more than 1 million times. A Google Blog Search today yielded nearly 40,000 results. The Wikipedia entry is 2 months old, 3,000 words long, and contains 39 footnotes. In the progressive Christian community, the blogs are all over this. Obviously, Jena has been a lead topic on the African-American blogosphere (on sites that cover everything from politics to hip-hop) for months.

So why did the big progressive sites take so long to focus on Jena? Ezra’s take that this was an “issue of the traditional left” is off-target. The big-name civil rights figures had to scramble to catch up with Jena. There wasn’t a central planning committee directing yesterday’s protests — the organization came together from the bottom up. The protests in Jena were the result of conversation and debate on the social networks, in blogs, over message boards, through email, and on African-American radio shows. It looked like a true, decentralized, “people-powered” movement.

The big progressive blogs missed the story initially for a variety of reasons, including their and their readership’s demographics, but also because of their focus on developments in Washington and in electoral politics. As the Jena story reached a critical point last week, most blogs were overwhelmingly focused on the Kabuki theater of the Senate debate on Iraq and MoveOn.

Ten thousand people marching on Jena is pretty substantive proof that the online left is bigger and more diverse than readers of Daily Kos. In fact, it extends beyond blogs altogether, as illustrated by the role of social networks in creating and channeling energy towards the Jena protests. The Rev. Al Sharpton said that the protests marked the start of a 21st century civil rights movement. Jena might also mark the start of a new phase in online progressive politics as well.

VERY interesting that 1) most of the nationwide organizing around the Jena 6 was done online and was done through bottom-up organizing (instead of top-down). And 2) most of the major (shall i say mainstream?) progressive blogs did not cover the issue like the mass mobilization movement it was.

There’s a similar post about this issue on DailyKos, and the comments to that post are VERY telling. Seems like people of color and whites see issues quite differently.

On another but similar note, BFP wrote a post entitled “The ‘Nobody’ posting about the Jersey political prisoners” and goes on to share a number of blogs that have written about the queer women of color in Newark, NJ who were targeted for hate crimes when they were actually ATTACKED as part of a hate crime (similarities to the Jena 6). Looks like it’s mostly people of color who have blogged about it, mobilized around it. Apparently it must have been stated somewhere that nobody was writing about this issue. BFP responds with:

The erasure of work through the creation of “nobody” discourse = the continued marginalization of the worker.
Or: It’s funny how “nobody” is always so damn colored.

Reminds me also of the question that arises every few months, predictably, in the progressive blogosphere — “Where are the women of color bloggers?” and “Where are the people of color bloggers?”

A few days ago, on the eve of the 1 year anniversary of the Olympics (that China’s hosting), a group of activists performed a HUGE banner drop of a Free Tibet banner ON the Great wall of China! My friend Nupur Modi participated in it, and there are videos and other links on the Students for a Free Tibet website. Lhadon Tethong, the executive Director of Students for a Free Tibet was also in China blogging about her experiences there (which I hear is illegal to do in China) during and after the event. She runs a text and video blog at Beijing Wide Open, it’s phenomenal (and she’s hot too). :>

They were all detained after the event, by Chinese authorities, but now are safe and home in the US and Canada. Lhadon writes:

I know we did this and got off pretty easy. And while I appreciate that some people think I did something brave, I’m not sure I did. Bravery is standing in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square. Bravery is getting on a stage in Tibet and calling for the return of the Dalai Lama. Bravery is going to Beijing to petition to get compensation for your confiscated farmland to the very same government that probably took it in the first place. All this, with no protection. No foreign passport, government, or official body that will defend you.

What I did, what we did, it was nothing in comparison. But I hope and I pray that somehow we have made a difference in the battle for human rights and freedom in Tibet and in China. The Olympics spotlight is on the Chinese leadership now and they want the world to believe they are open and free. But they are not. They demonstrated this by deporting me at the very moment that the one-year countdown to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games was taking place in Tiananmen square. Paul and I just wanted to attend. To see it for ourselves and to blog about it like one should be able to in any place that truly enjoys freedom.

Some people have said we got what we deserved. Others have suggested we got off to lightly and should act more responsibly next time. I think it is the regime in Beijing – unelected, unaccountable and tyrannical – that should act more responsibly. I think our government, governments around the world, corporations doing business in China and the IOC itself, should act more responsibly. They are the ones who have clear and direct influence over Beijing. They are the ones who could make a huge impact by doing just a little in the way of speaking up for and promoting human rights and democracy.

Until this happens, we will keep doing what we have to do – challenging China’s control over Tibet and working to make the occupation too costly to maintain. One thing is clear in all this Olympics mess, the Chinese government cares what the world thinks. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t spend so much time trying to get us all to like them with slogans like “One World One Dream.” Knowing this, we must push them to change. And if our direct actions are seen as stunts by a few, I trust the vast majority will see them for what they really are, nonviolent expressions of dissent and protest to bring positive social and political change to people living under brutal oppression.

For Tibetans, Uighurs, Southern Mongolians, Taiwanese, Falun Gong, Christians, Catholics, farmers, factory workers, lawyers, doctors, journalists and every other person who lives under fear of persecution by the Chinese Communist Party and their goons, I say, we will never give up.

We stand with you.

Definitely check out her blog Beijing Wide Open. She’s inspired a little part of me to start videoblogging. But not yet, i’ve gotta marinate on it a bit.

My friend Nupur Modi, who was one of 6 who actually performed the banner drop, writes this:

We had the glamorous jobs. We were the ones to hang a banner on the Great Wall and make sure the footage got out to the world. I’m not saying that doing the action, and then being detained in China, being interrogated, and facing extreme consequences wasn’t hard and challenging.

But the hardest part is the unknown. And you all had to face the most of that. We were dealing with the situation minute-by-minute in bite-sized pieces. But not knowing what was happening to people you care about and not hearing from them for days, that can be distressing.

I truly appreciate all of your amazing strength, support, thoughts, and prayers through the process.

While we were in police custody trying to find the most comfortable position to sleep and pass the time in old Chinese police station chairs (answer: there is none), we found comfort and strength knowing that folks on the outside were working nonstop: getting media and the word out, pulling strings via diplomatic channels, calling and pressuring the embassies, providing emotional support to friends and family, etc., etc., etc. The six of us weren’t the only ones in that action, it was a whole community effort. I probably will never know about all the people who were involved and all the crucial roles they played, but I owe you all a sincere THANK YOU.

I truly appreciate all of emails and phone calls of commendation for my courage and “bad-ass-ness”. But let us please not forget the issue at hand. I am a US citizen, and with it comes innumerable benefits, resources, and privileges. I had it easy. Tibetans are struggling and taking action every single day, facing constant repression and violent rule. They don’t have freedom of speech or religion, and they are trying to preserve their culture. They are the true heroes.

Thank you, thank you, Nupur and the rest who participated in this action.

Oh I also wanted to add this — check out an interview on Canadian TV with Lhadon — what’s the most phenomenal, i think, is the amount of airtime they devote to this human rights issue. Would you EVER see this much time devoted to Tibet in the US? We’ve gotta break down the mainstream media, it’s brainwashing us all.

Think about supporting Students for a Free Tibet in whatever way you can. Whether that’s being the media (spread the word) or otherwise…

You’re going to be moved by this one.

At the AFL-CIO democratic presidential candidate debate this past week, retired union member Steve Skvara asked a simple health care question of the candidates.  In response, he received a STANDING OVATION from thousands of audience members in the stadium.  This is phenomenal, it is amazing how front-and-center health care is in the peoples’ minds, during this election.  Check out the video:

And Mitt Romney was challeneged on health care while giving a stump speech in a restaurant, where he mentioned his desire to export “healthcare diplomacy” to other nations, and a waitress really prodded him on the american health care system.  Video below:

Exciting.  Also related, not to health care but to the use of these technologies — the CNN/YouTube republican presidential candidate debate is coming up (september 17th).  Thanks to Pop and Politics for sharing sharing two YouTube videos that americans have submittedthese two videos submitted by viewers — good, solid, hard-hitting questions:

I’m so absolutely fascinated by videoblogging, YouTube, and other video/audio technologies, and especially with their use in politics and health.

In the meantime, I’ll be participating in tomorrow’s Great LA Health Care Rally sponsored by OneCareNow and other organizations, in support of universal health care in California, and hope to post some video footage from that event!

[cross-posted at Cure This]

Today I saw most of the Visible Vote 08 democratic presidential candidate forum online, LIVE! Some thoughts:

  • The Visible Vote 08 website is TIIIIIGHT! During the live debate, they had live blogging, good photos, rapid video summaries of the candidates who had spoken just minutes prior, the ability for anybody to comment on the debate, good streaming live video with wonderful sound, a vote for which presidential candidate you support most on LGBT issues, and right after the live debate they put together video clips from all the candidates. Sweet! Ok, probably VERY costly to put together, but nicely done.
  • Who won the debate? Hands down, I’d have to say the moderators. HANDS DOWN. I don’t care how eloquent Obama was, how not-angry Mike Gravel seemed, how personable John Edwards was. Gotta give it to the moderators. Melissa Etheridge took the candidates to TASK — remember, this is the JOB of a moderator. She asked personal questions, she came back at a candidate and asked for more clarification on a question if the candidate averted the original question, and she was spontaneous and on POINT. I’ll say the SAME about the other two moderators — Joe Salomnese (HRC) and Jonathan Capehart (Washington Post). (the head moderator was also good — margaret carlson, former white house correspondent). This debate really made me think about the role of moderator. The questions were SPECIFIC, related to actual things each candidate did or said in the past, and oftentimes related the issues to broader issues that the candidates had to answer to. With the exception of a few questions, I found myself going “wow, great QUESTION!” after almost each one. Looking back, these moderators were all queer, all personally invested and politically invested in the issues discussed. Here’s a radical idea — what if we required moderators of all debates to be personally invested or at least politically invested in the issues (not like wolf blitzer or anderson cooper)? I guess that was partially the direction that the CNN/YouTube debate was going in, but the candidates ended up having too much leeway to direct the answer away from the question.
  • I really really appreciate the fact that all these candidates showed up to the debate. This is historic. In so many ways. Just a point of contrast, not ONE single republican candidate has agreed to show for a similar debate. If you will recall, only 2 republican candidates (and not any of the major ones) agreed to a YouTube style debate (like the CNN/YouTube debate for the dem candidates) in September. Notice I titled this post “LGBT presidential candidate forum”. I didn’t mention dems or republicans. What’s the point, the republicans aren’t making themselves visible.
  • Senator Obama. Smooth talking. Somewhat from the heart. Had some good things to say about homophobia in the black community, about his commitment to LGBT rights, but as always was slimy (talking around the issue) when it came to his support or non support of civil unions vs gay marriage. He won the debate online (got 34% of the online poll) but I think he’s mostly a smooth talker.
  • John Edwards. Oh he’s my man. Have I mentioned I *heart* Edwards and feel he is the most electable? As always he spoke from the heart. Was honest about not supporting gay marriage but supporting civil unions. Also spoke passionately about homeless gay teens in los angeles and how he was moved by their stories (after his recent trip to the LA Gay and Lesbian Center). Brought it back to the tale of two americas. Diplomatically refuted a question Melissa Etheridge asked about him being uncomfortable around gay people (NOT true!). He stumbled a bit through the forum, which isn’t like him these days. I missed the dinner/reception he was having at a local LA restaurant because I thought i’d get out of work too late. Heard it was good, from a friend.
  • Kucinich. Wow. Ok, not really electable, but I *heart* him too. Let’s just summarize his time by the moderator’s comments to him: Capehart: “Is there anything that the LGBT community wants that you ‘don’t’ support?” Etheridge: “I hope you always run for president until you win.” But the funniest — moderator: “Congressman, you are so evolved for a member of congress”. Kucinich gets #2 in the online poll on the visible vote website. Supports equal marriage rights for LGBT couples.
  • Mike Gravel. Took some xanax before the show? He wasn’t his riled up self! He was the uncle I want to have dinner with and talk politics with. It was really refreshing to see him casual and confident and pleasant. He’s a great guy, hands down. Check out some of his videos on the Visible Vote 08 site, some GREAT quotes there. Supports equal marriage rights for LGBT couples.
  • Bill Richardson. Bumbling. Slow talking. Brings things back to his record on voting, which is a good tactic. But hardly answers any questions directly. And when asked if homosexuality is a choice or otherwise, he right away answers with “it’s a choice!” He answers so quickly that the moderator has to ask the question again (maybe you didn’t understand the question) and gives background on people who think homosexuality is a choice that can be mended, fixed. I lose attention here as he drones on about how he’s not a scientist, etc. BLAH. Didn’t have an answer for what he’d do if given a bill in support of gay marriage. How is he still in the race?
  • Hillary Clinton. She’s a robot, she knows exactly what to say and when! You’d think she WAS president for 8 years already (instead of her husband). Gotta give her kudos for all that. She’s got good energy, and had quick responses back to the moderators. BUT, she REALLY tripped up when she mentioned that her non-support for gay marriage is a personal position but didn’t give any backup for that. And then she had another moment when she tried to defend her belief that gay rights are really an issue that should be left up to the states. Moderator Solomnese came RIGHT back at her, recalling that racists used states rights arguments when fighting against federal civil rights in the 1960′s. BLAM! gotcha. (see above mentioned winner of forum — MODERATORS!)

Phew! more than I thought I’d say. Check out the videos (already all up online with sections for each candidate — go online team!) at Visible Vote 08. Also check out the reportback from thebrotherlove. We were using Twitter together, sharing thoughts on the forum online as it was streaming live. We’re such geeks!
Over and out…

UPDATE: Anil Kalhan alerted me to a solid criticism of the moderators’ specifically and only asking the black candidate (Obama) about black homophobia and generalizing black homophobia in the first place (the entire black community does not think the way the black homophobes do, so it’s kind of a faulty term).

So the jury’s out — Huffington Post’s “Fundrace 2008” — fascinating and creepy? or voyueristic and creepy? or friends now, enemies after you find out your neighbor voted for giuliani? or the next best thing in online technology for election 2008? in any case, it’s pretty damn revealing. and powerful. I absolutely love location-based technology, including local community blogging (otherwise known as “place blogging) and muckraking “hyperlocal” tools. But the most interesting findings come from hanging out on the site a bit, and exploring the money/power/respect issues inherent in our “democratic” elections. This, from the huffington post:

The zip code search engine on FundRace provides concrete evidence of how much more influence the rich exercise than the poor. Look at such upscale communities as Greenwich, Conn., 06830, Beverly Hills, 90210; or a swath of Manhattan’s upper east side, 10021.

If money is power, the folks in these zip codes have got it in spades — and they use it by the bucketful. In Beverly Hills, for example, there have been 543 donations totaling $1,212,014 to 2008 presidential candidates, including 326 contributions of $2,300 or more. (Primary contributions are limited by federal election law to $2,300 per candidate.)

Across town, in contrast, in dirt-poor South Central Los Angeles, zip 90011, a grand total of three people have given $4,250 total. This is 0.2 percent of what Beverly Hills gave.

Similarly, eastside Manhattan’s 10021 – the single best source of campaign cash in the country, ranking first or second with every major presidential candidate — has produced $4.3 million in 2056 donations. A couple of miles away in the Bronx’s 10056, there have been, to date, no contributions whatsoever.

I realize that I mentioned Cure This on this site recently but made no mention of what it was and why. Here’s a quick description:

For two and a half years, “Cure This” was a pipe dream shared by just a handful of us. We envisioned a grand goal: to create an online space to discuss health in its broadest sense, share personal stories, creatively make positive change, and build an online community along the way — connecting us locally, nationally, and perhaps internationally. We envisioned a humble beginning: here and now.

Cure This has now transformed into a reality, and we’re excited beyond words. We welcome it into this world with a loving, gentle nudge and an encouraging whisper in its ear. Let the beautiful journey begin.

Yes! We have 25 users so far and quite a few posts. Lively discussion has begun on the site. We hope it may be a “home” of sorts for important discussion of broad health issues, and a place where stories can be shared and strategy discussed. We hope to feed people to organizations that are doing amazing work, and possibly connect smaller groups who thought that nobody else in the world was doing similar work :>

New features are being implemented daily, thanks to my wonderful, wonderful brother Nalin, who’s doing all the programming and creative design for the site. We’re rolling out a “recommended diaries” section where the most highly voted posts will hang out. We’re rolling out profiles for users (so others can understand some of the context of where they’re coming from, and which will serve as a mechanism for folks to network with each other). A few “how-to’s” will also be posted, for those wondering how to write posts, how to navigate around the site, etc. We’re also down with any suggestions you may have.

I shared the website and the idea with quite a few people at the United States Social Forum last weekend, and the response was total excitement. sweet…

Please check out Cure This and feel free to create a free user account and comment or post as you’d like, on issues of health, activism, SICKO, well-being, neighborhoods, etc. it’s free reign for now! Organic evolution!

I’m off to the Allied Media Conference in Detroit — it’s the conference that used to be called “Your DIY guide to everyday revolution”!

I’m absolutely honored and humbled to do a session with others on using online organizing to bolster offline organizing efforts, especially on issues that pertain to women of color. I’ll be on a panel with some amazing women of color (Alexis Pauline Gumbs and Serena Sebring of UBUNTU and Broken Beautiful Press, and myself, and moderated by Brownfemipower my heroine!) Here’s the description of the panel:

Saturday, 2:00pm-3:20pm — Hijaking the Masters Tools

Technology as an organizing tool is often presented as only accessible to people with privilege. The reality is that working class and poor women of color organizers are using the internet in powerful ways– through blogs, vlogs, community forums and podcasting. However the belief that technology is inherently inaccessible is deep-rooted. As a result online / offline organizing efforts are often detached from each other. How can the media projects and organizing work of women of color online strengthen the work taking place in the streets, and vice versa? What has already been done to bridge this gap? What do we need to do moving forward?

This panel will put forward a vision for how the combined forces of online organizing and offline organizing can build a movement to end violence against women of color and create a new society based on liberation and love. Then it will invite lively discussion around the nitty gritty of what we need to do to make it happen.

Exciting! Can’t to hear peoples’ stories, do some scheming with others, and meet some inspiring folks. I hear the conference is wired, so i’m hoping to do some liveblogging from there this weekend (starting saturday morning).

And mmmm Detroit! I’ve never been there, really looking forward to setting foot in this vibrant city with so much history, culture, and grassroots energy…

From “Doctors, Legislators Resist Drugmakers’ Prying Eyes” (Washington Post, may 22, 2007)

Seattle pediatrician Rupin Thakkar’s first inkling that the pharmaceutical industry was peering over his shoulder and into his prescription pad came in a letter from a drug representative about the generic drops Thakkar prescribes to treat infectious pinkeye.

In the letter, the salesperson wrote that Thakkar was causing his patients to miss more days of school than they would if he put them on Vigamox, a more expensive brand-name medicine made by Alcon Laboratories.

Rupin’s one of my co-board members from the wonderful organization the National Physicians Alliance! If the above two short paragraphs don’t incense physicians (and the public), I don’t know what does. It’s a vulnerable position that doctors in the United States occupy — we are watched and peddled by pharmaceutical companies; we are slaves to the insurance companies that decide to deny or accept the standard of care that we provide to our patients (how many countless hours go into calling insurance companies to get approval for the medicine that your patient needs or the procedure that your patient needs); and we are screwed by the financial disencentives of taking more than 5 minutes to actually explore what’s contributing to patients’ health or sickness.

“It’s a key weapon in determining how we want to tailor our sales pitch,” said Shahram Ahari, a former drug detailer for Eli Lilly who is now a researcher at the University of California at San Francisco’s School of Pharmacy. “The programs give them [doctors] a score of 1 to 10 based on how much they write. Once we have that, we know who our primary targets are. We focus our time on the big [prescription] writers — the 10s, the 9s, and then less so on the 8s and 7s. . . . We’re dealing with individual physicians who might give us the biggest dividend for our investment.”

I’m trying to cut off my puppet strings!

Please check out the blog of the National Physicians Alliance! A few of us thought it would be a great idea to give greater voice online to this collective physicians’ voice, and the blog was created. I just redesigned the look of the blog. There are a few glitches (working on fixing them), but any thoughts/suggestions on the blog? Hey, and you can post comments on any of the posts there too :>

I agree with this part of Liza’s post:

I have to say that John Edwards may be the hardest working candidate from the whole crop of presidential hopefuls on both ends of the political spectrum. It’s not just the fact that he is the only one who continues to put out the most policy proposals on a regular basis. It’s the fact that he started earlier and with a clearly long-term strategy represented by the community platform his developed under for JohnEdwards.com.

Whereas Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton have created sites to support their candidacies money making strategies, Edwards site was founded as a platform for communications, strategy deployment and community building before it became a source for his presidential fundraising.

You can tell by perusing John Edwards’s site that he has a well developed and strategized use of blogs, forums, chatrooms and other new media tools. The feel and tone of his site is head and shoulders above the Obama and Clinton sites as far as full civic engagement that goes beyond his candidacy.

Many of these districts had sought to prepare their students for a technology-driven world and close the so-called digital divide between students who had computers at home and those who did not.

“After seven years, there was literally no evidence it had any impact on student achievement — none,” said Mark Lawson, the school board president here in Liverpool, one of the first districts in New York State to experiment with putting technology directly into students’ hands. “The teachers were telling us when there’s a one-to-one relationship between the student and the laptop, the box gets in the way. It’s a distraction to the educational process.”

Liverpool’s turnabout comes as more and more school districts nationwide continue to bring laptops into the classroom. Federal education officials do not keep track of how many schools have such programs, but two educational consultants, Hayes Connection and the Greaves Group, conducted a study of the nation’s 2,500 largest school districts last year and found that a quarter of the 1,000 respondents already had one-to-one computing, and fully half expected to by 2011…

Such disappointments are the latest example of how technology is often embraced by philanthropists and political leaders as a quick fix, only to leave teachers flummoxed about how best to integrate the new gadgets into curriculums. Last month, the United States Department of Education released a study showing no difference in academic achievement between students who used educational software programs for math and reading and those who did not…

But Mr. Warschauer, who supports laptop programs, said schools like Liverpool might be giving up too soon because it takes time to train teachers to use the new technology and integrate it into their classes. For instance, he pointed to students at a middle school in Yarmouth, Me., who used their laptops to create a Spanish book for poor children in Guatemala and debate Supreme Court cases found online.

“Where laptops and Internet use make a difference are in innovation, creativity, autonomy and independent research,” he said. “If the goal is to get kids up to basic standard levels, then maybe laptops are not the tool. But if the goal is to create the George Lucas and Steve Jobs of the future, then laptops are extremely useful.”

from “Seeing No Progress, Some Schools Drop Laptops“, NYTimes, May 4, 2007.

If I may, I’ll add a few questions. Did these schools have a concrete plan for integrating computer technology into the curriculum or, more likely, did they just hop on the laptop bandwagon? How did the school districts intend to incorpate math and other paper/pencil subjects into the curriculum? How did they NOT expect students to surf the web, use instant messaging programs, and find ways around barriers to socialnetworking and websites? How do they expect to keep students’ attention when students get to have laptops in front of them ALL the time? In other words, why didn’t think they think of using the laptops during specific lessons or exercises and NOT during others? (maybe they did this). And I agree with Warschauer — you can’t expect laptops to increase studnets’ SCORES necessarily on lame-ass standardized tests. Laptops and innovative uses of such technologies have the best results when used for research and creativity (which in my book have a LOT of use in the classroom setting, if used right)…

A few things I’d use laptops in the classroom for (were I a teacher or a school administrator):

1. Teaching kids how to effectively search for good sources of information for the history, social studies, or related topics they’re working on. Practical skill. SO useful.

2. Creating a blog or discussion site for kids to post their creative thoughts to.

3. Using online videos and other interactive media formats for classwork and homework assignments.

But through all this, there would definitely have to be laptop on and laptop off times, in order to facilitate concentration and less distractions during various times of the day. If I had a laptop at school that I could use during all my classes (some of which were gag me with a spoon boring, and others which were not conducive to laptop use) i’d be breaking security codes to be able to distribute instant messaging to MY friends too.

I don’t mean to be wholly critical, as I understand the challenges involved (teachers who aren’t bought into the idea of using this technology, the costs of repairing laptops on a daily basis, and the distractions present in laptop use) and I also know that school administrators had only good intentions when they picked up the idea of using laptops in the classroom. And I’m SO sure that many classrooms have actually benefitted from the use of laptops. Fascinating topic.

Imagine this — you have 5 minutes to adlib a powerpoint presentation on a topic you know little about (or a lot about). The powerpoint presentation is someone ELSE’s, and you’ve never seen it before. Go! (egg timer starts)…

Add a little drink, a fun audience, and 5 other adlib presenters, and you’ve got quite a party in the making. I experienced this phenomenon at Barcamp LA (wiki and blog) last month, and I was laughing so hard I had tears rolling down my face. All 5 presenters were hilarious, though I was only able to record one on my digital camera’s video recording system (I ran out of memory space after that!) The video’s naturally grainy (taken on a digital camera, remember) but here’s Heather’s adlib presentation:

I tried to organize a PPT karaoke during the pre-party piece of my birthday party this month, even had a friend bring over an LCD projector, but plans didn’t quite work right. But i’m not droppin’ the idea, my friends already know that there’s going to be another one soon at my place! And I hear through the grapevine that BarCampers are thinkin’ of doing a dedicated LA ppt karaoke night soon…

London’s got it comin’ this week too!

Heather’s got a great post detailing the how-to’s of organizing your own PPT Karaoke event. And SlideShare and CreativeCommons are good sites to download random powerpoints from.

And an aside — how much does familiarity of a topic affect ability to creatively adlib it?

I ask this because there was an informal continuation of ppt karaoke later in the night at BarCamp LA3. A participant added to the mix of random ppt presentations two of his sister’s presentation for medical school — one a case presentation of a patient who had a mucinous adenocarcinoma (cancer) complete with Xrays and labs and path and other visuals, and another presentation on late prenatal care and its effects. So there were tech geeks trying to adlib readings of chest xrays and case presentations (for example an AAA = abdominal aortic aneurysm, was interpreted as needing to call the triple A for car assistance! A chest xray came up on the screen and the presenter said “oh gosh this is BAD, he’s gonna die”. And a graph on the trimester at which pregnant women sought prenatal care for the first time was re-interpreted as the age at which women started having sex). It was SO fascinating to watch this as a doctor. I had a strong desire to “have a go at” one of those presentations, but then I they’d probably not be funny anymore (i’d have to try extra hard TO make them funny because the topics were so relevant to my work). So my question is — do tech people have this conundrum with familiar topics in their adlib ppts? Or are they just more creative than I am with blasphemizing topics familiar to them?

But wait, there’s more on the Crackberry addiction — from Bereft of BlackBerrys, the Untethered Make Do – New York Times.  There was a recent Blackberry outage for about 10 hours, and the world almost imploded.  A divine intervention allowed people to use this 10 hours to reflect on their addictions:

“I quit smoking 28 years ago,” she said, “and that was easier than being without my BlackBerry.”

Ok that’s big.  No wonder blackberries are referred to as crackberries.

Rob Whitehouse, vice president for communication of University Hospitals in Cleveland, was brought face to face with his powerful addiction at 11 p.m. on Tuesday night, when he realized he was “jonesing” for a message on his inexplicably silent device.

“I have reached the point where I get phantom vibrations, even when I’m not carrying the thing,” he said. “That sure doesn’t sound too healthy, does it?”

Funny.  I get phantom vibrations from my pager, even when i’m not carrying it.  It’s a function of feeling like a slave to it, having it possibly go off at any time in the day or night when you’re in the hospital and having to respond to a simple Tylenol request or a serious life-and-death situation.  That doesn’t sound too healthy either.  Two extreme desires — an addiction to a piece of technology, a fear of a piece of technology — but a similar phantom vibrating result.

Anyway, we’ll have to practice “harm reduction” — since we’ll probably not stop using these drugs we’re addicted to (crackberries or heroin-email), we must find safer ways of using them. I’m as addicted to email as the rest of them.  Sweet sweet email.  I blogged previously about a good 12-step program for addressing your Crackberry addiction — a consumer tested method to free you up to spend more time doing things (and people) you love.

Already, it’s easy for a company like Google to track what users do online and sell that information to the highest bidder. What happens when companies link that capability with the ability to know where users are physically when they log onto the wi-fi network? We might see a new era in racial profiling, where Google or companies like it sell information to police about what people in black neighborhoods are searching for online. If anybody does a suspicious search for “drugs” or “the Nation of Islam,” that person could easily become the object of a fishing expedition by police.

There are many software tools that people use to protect their privacy online, but will impoverished people on the free wi-fi network know about them or be able to use them over slow connections? The new digital divide won’t be between people who can get online and those who can’t; instead, it will be between people who can afford to create privacy for themselves on the Web and those who don’t have the resources to do it.

Excerpt from the essay “Is Digital Racial Profiling on Tap?”, by Analee Newitz, AlterNet.com, April 9, 2007.

Newitz describes herself as “a surly media nerd who wants everybody to have equal access to both the Internet and digital privacy”.   Right on!

This weekend, something so absolutely sweet is happening — BarCamp LA! (Official Wiki and Official Blog). It’s a full weekend gathering in Downtown LA (including camping out Saturday night at the warehouse) where people interested in technology and its application for good and craziness are coming together to discuss. The concept of this “un-conference” is supercool — people show up Saturday morning and sign up to present something (everything from new internet technologies to yoga for computer geeks to organizing your life to Making a Digital Video Camera for $35) and then the party begins.

I’m going and will hopefully present something informally on internet technologies/tools and the health justice movement (the two concepts haven’t really met yet). I’m stoked to share a bit of this movement and the potential for uniting online, and even more excited to receive feedback from people who know so much more about internet technologies (maybe engage with some interested folks too? the health justice movement needs more geeks!).

BarCamp LA’s last major weekend gathering was a few months ago, called BarCamp-LA 2. And there are monthly Geek Dinners attended by some of the same folks (lovers of internet technology), much smaller scale though. I’m going to try to go to the next one this Tuesday. Check out the Geek Dinner wiki.

The BarCamp phenomenon is huge — there are BarCamps all over the world! BarCamp Nairobi is coming up in Kenya later this month! I was just in Nairobi in January, and I wish this barcamp would have overlapped with my trip — it would have been so exciting to experience. I had a blast networking with a few African attendees (who were interested in internet technology and community organizing) at the World Social Forum in Nairobi in January, which was exhilarating. Hopefully there will be an online wrapup of BarCamp Nairobi. Good luck folks!

Here’s a snippet of a great post on the BarCamp blog entitled “Dispelling Social Anxiety and Fears about attending BarCamp LA”:

1. Fear of not being “Tech-savvy” enough.

BarcampLA is not just for coders. Though the focus is on technology, we gather people of all disciplines, philosophies and skillsets for the purpose of knowledge sharing and community building. The use of technology to connect people and improve lives is a shared goal and passion of most Barcampers. You will not be ridiculed or diminished if you don’t speak in binary, or if you have no idea who Ruby is, or why she’s on Rails, or why people would be talking about the cleaning product AJAX. People who come to Barcamp are programmers as well as users, and if you don’t understand something, someone there will be kind enough to explain it to you. Isn’t that beautiful?

So come join! It’s not too late to sign up. And if you don’t want to present something, you can help with setup or other duties during the gathering.

Now the big question is this — has my coolness factor increased or seriously plunged after this nerdy post?

As culture minister Gil has also sponsored an initiative called the Cultural Points program. Small government grants are issued to scores of community centers in poor neighborhoods of some of Brazil’s largest cities to install recording and video studios and teach residents how to use them.

The result has been an outpouring of video and music, much of it racially conscious and politically tinged rap or electronica. Since Brazilian commercial radio, which is said to be riddled with payola, will not play the new music, the creators instead broadcast their songs on community radio stations and distribute their CDs independently, at markets and fairs, rather than through existing record labels.

From “Gilberto Gil and the Politics of Music“, March 12, 2007.

Note to self: incorporate this into the 10 year neighborhood/clinic plan. :>

I just received word about tomorrow’s event “Unsilent Night” at Pan Pacific Regional Park in Los Angeles:

An electronic caroling party for an infinite number of boomboxes. At once peaceful, electric, dreamy, and communal, this is a chance to be part of a greater stereo system and celebrate the holiday spirit.

Different parts of the composition will be distributed on cassettes and CDs. At the given signal,participants will simultaneously press PLAY. When the tapes start rolling, ‘they blossom into a marvelously crafted symphony’ (Time Out New York). Then the crowd will walk a predetermined route within the park, reaching a beautiful climax, making full use of the park’s diverse landscape. UNSILENT NIGHT will reverberate off the trees and hills, accompanied at times by the din of distant traffic, resulting in a drifting cloud of ethereal undulating sound.

Participants will meet at the basketball courts next to the parking lot at 6:45 p.m. The event will begin at 7:00 p.m. The piece is approximately 40 minutes long. The more boomboxes there are, the more ‘voices’ in the piece.

now THAT sounds like a fun gathering in los angeles! too bad i’ll be at work during those hours. Phil Kline, who started this event that now occurs around the world, has a myspace page which also includes the music for Unsilent Night.

(photo from wikipedia’s entry on boomboxes)

From the Wall Street Journal article “Blackberry Orphans”:

Emma Colonna wishes her parents would behave, at least when they’re out in public. The ninth-grade student in Port Washington, N.Y., says she has caught her parents typing emails on their Treos during her eighth-grade awards ceremony, at dinner and in darkened movie theaters. “During my dance recital, I’m 99% sure they were emailing except while I was on stage,” she says. “I think that’s kind of rude.”

Emma, 14, also identifies with adults who wish their kids spent less time playing videogames. “At my student orientation for high school, my mom was playing solitaire,” she says. “She has a bad attention span.” Her mother, Barbara Chang, the chief executive of a nonprofit group, says, “It’s become this crutch.”

Safety is another issue. Will Singletary, a 9-year-old in Atlanta, doesn’t approve of his dad’s proclivity for typing while driving. “It makes me worried he’s going to crash,” he says. “He only looks up a few times.” His dad, private banker Ross Singletary, calls it “a legit concern.” He adds: “Some emails are important enough to look at en route.”

Some mental-health professionals report that the intrusion of mobile email gadgets and wireless technology into family life is a growing topic of discussion in therapy. They have specific tips for dealing with the problem, like putting the device in a drawer during a set time period every day. “A lot of kids are upset by it,” says Geraldine Kerr, a licensed marriage and family therapist in Morristown, N.J. She says parents need to recognize that some situations require undivided attention. When you shut off the device, she says, “You’re communicating nonverbally that ‘you matter and what’s important to you is important to me.’ ”

Still, like teenagers sneaking cigarettes behind school, parents are secretly rebelling against the rules. The children of one New Jersey executive mandate that their mom ignore her mobile email from dinnertime until their bedtime. To get around their dictates, the mother hides the gadget in the bathroom, where she makes frequent trips before, during and after dinner. The kids “think I have a small bladder,” she says. She declined to be named because she’s afraid her 12- and 13-year-old children might discover her secret.

Some would retitle this phenomenon “Crackberry Orphans”. It’s pretty sad. The article mentions that part of the blame goes to corporations who give their employees Blackberries in order to maximize their efficiency while not in the office.

I currently have a love affair with my laptop and with email, both personal and listserv emails. I’m afraid to see my addictive personality at work if I were given a Blackberry. I especially hope I’m not like the above parents when I have children, yikes. And the Wall Street Journal compiled a healthy 12-step list for addicts, I like it so i’m sharing it below:

We sought advice for curbing the habitual email itch from a nearly a dozen professionals — a time-management expert, professors and therapists who specialize in family counseling and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Here are their recommendations:

1. During meals, do not check email.

2. Do not hide your email habits from family members. If you feel that someone would be upset to see you BlackBerrying, it’s a sign that you probably shouldn’t be.

3. Commit to stop emailing while driving (even at red lights), walking across the street or doing anything that requires careful attention.

4. Do not check email for the first hour of the day. In addition to giving you time to leisurely read the newspaper or spend time with your family, the practice will help you shake the tic-like checking ritual.

5. Endeavor to leave the mobile email device in the car or at home when attending any function taking place at your child’s school, or when picking up your child from school.

6. Decide on an email-free block of time. Parents should first assess their child’s conversational patterns — some like to talk about their day immediately after school, others just before bedtime. Even if your child doesn’t seem interested in talking, stick to your promise not to email during that time.

7. Set boundaries at work: Alert your colleagues that your mobile email device will be turned off during the predetermined time slot.

8. Actually turn off your device and stick it in a drawer during the time you’ve designated as email-free.

9. If you are in the middle of a work crisis, still try to respect some boundaries. Consider blocking out a few 15-minute periods to check email — and then turn the device off again. Honestly assess whether the situation at work is an actual crisis that can’t be solved without your oversight.

10. When emailing while socializing or spending time with your family, ask yourself if your priority at that moment is enjoying after-work activities or getting work done. If it is the former, power-down. If it’s the latter, return to the office.

11. Upon arriving home, practice a ritual that helps you mentally separate the work day from the after-work evening. Light a candle, put on music, pour a cocktail. Don’t check your email during this time.

12. If mobile email overuse creates tension between you and your significant other, consider creating jointly agreed-upon BlackBerry-free zones. For instance, unless your bedroom doubles as a home office, consider maintaining it as a sanctuary of your personal life.

I’ve fallen into the trap of number 12 previously. Not good! Follow the above rules, they work for email, cellphone use, crackberry use, and so many other things in life.

The first step is recognizing your problem. Hi my name is Anjali and I’m an addict. :>

My friend Vivek is a law student at UCLA and writes at a wonderful blog called Your Good Name. He participated in a protest organized by UCLA students, on the issue of a Persian-American student who was tasered (stunned by a stun gun with 50,000 volts) several times by community police in the university library. And he had this to say about the framing of the protest:

But after attending the protest today at UCLA, where the messaging was around public safety rather than police brutality and race, I realize that we do not have much time. We don’t have time to obfuscate, to skate over the issues that dig deep into us and threaten to rip us all apart.

If we don’t call things as they are – that Mostafa was targeted because he was a Persian male, that he was cuffed and then tazed more than four times because he was a person of color, that the UCPD’s actions have created a climate of fear for people of color all over campus, that ’safety’ as a message only means more cops and no change in accountability – then we all suffer.

We don’t have time to call things otherwise because eventually we all are going to be hit by this. And it will hurt like hell when it happens to us or to someone we love.

Amen. I agree with that. Here’s to calling it like it is, for our kids’ sake. Good analysis, Vivek.

Now, for some other thoughts on the tasering incident:

[1] I’m so impressed by the actions of the student who was tasered in this incident. I mean, he fell to the ground, limp (in true civil nonviolent disobedience style) when the police wouldn’t let go of him. He called the police out on the Patriot Act while they had their tasers pointed at him. He repeatedly explained to the police that he wasn’t attacking them. Do you know what a taser does to you? It’s 50,000 volts of stun gun. Makes you lose bowel and bladder control in many cases and literally stuns you into paralysis for a few minutes. And all that time, between the taser shots, Mostafa Tabatabainejad was telling the policemen like it was. I don’t think I could have been so courageous.

[2]
Don’t know what i’m talking about? Haven’t checked out the YouTube video yet that was shot on a cell phone videocamera? Indymedia has a link to the video here (disturbing) — [link]. Upon seeing this video, I was shocked (no pun intended) by how brazen the police were, KNOWING very well they had an good sized audience of undergraduate student witnesses (and maybe they even saw the cell phones pointing at them, shooting video). I mean, how do you do this with an audience? How do you not think twice about the brutality of it? I wonder how brutal they would have been if there was NO audience. Can you even imagine? And in the last minute of the video, a police officer tells students to leave and then threatens “or we’ll taser you too” after they ask for his badge number. Wait, i thought we at least ACTED like we live in a democracy… (and by the way, how brilliant that that was caught on video)

[3] It made my day to see, on the front page of the LA Times, impassioned students marching with signs taped to their chests saying “I’m Studying, Don’t Taser Me”. More often than not, the mainstream media picks up an outlier at a rally doing something really weird, to place as their photo representing an event. And if the event even gets a photo or article, it’s usually nowhere near page 1. So thanks LA Times for placing the photo and article front and center. Did I just “thank” a newspaper for representing the peoples’ voice?

[4] Back in 2004 (sounds so long ago!) there was talk of tasers becoming available to the public for consumer purchase (yes, we’re talking negotiations between taser manufacturers and the retail shop The Sharper Image. I wrote a post on my other blog To the Teeth about it, and compared our society to that in Minority Report (Department of PreCrime).

[5] If it was a white boy who was asked to leave the library? He wouldn’t be tasered, first of all. And second, if he was tasered, there would be no talk of well…maybe…why didn’t he just leave…why cause trouble…maybe he deserved it…well not deserved it…but he was kinda asking for it… maybe he wanted publicity… and all the other twisted arguments I’ve heard.

[6] I love you cellphone videocameras. And I love you YouTube. There’s nothing like you two. You’ve done so much for documenting and sharing in this world, and you are yet so very, very young.

I wish I had known about the Web of Change conference earlier — I’d be there in a second. I’m not a techy much myself (although in my circle of like-minded doctor folk, I come off as one, because I know what a “blog” is and because I’m psychotically fascinated by how the internet and “web 2.0″ can help facilitate community building and power building. And I do enjoy discussing the similarities among peanut butter and jelly, the web 2.0, and health justice).

My friend Adrienne Marie Brown, an absolutely wonderful woman and the current Executive Director of the Ruckus Society, gave a session at this conference. I’m reposting Kate Milberry’s reportback from that session (and a link to it, on the web of change website is here). It’s beautiful (and where things are bolded, emphasis is mine):


Titilating Technology

Submitted by Kate Milberry on Thu, 2006-09-21 14:09.

Maybe you know Ruckus Society, maybe you don’t. But for those of us who didn’t know Adrienne Maree Brown before today’s session, we won’t be forgetting her any time soon. For starters, she made us sing. I was fine with that but, not being a singer (in fact, being almost tone deaf) I didn’t know this meant standing up. One gets lazy once one has parked one’s ass on the floor.

So, we all sang a note (which one, I couldn’t say) and it reminded me of church. I’ve not been in a long time, but still, the music (when not in Catholic mass – unless midnite mass on xmas eve) is typically uplifting. And in fact, it set the tone for Adrienne’s talk, which ended with her calling our geek work divne, and the geeks among us holy! Holy @%!*; that’s a nice compliment.

Adrienne started her talk as she ended it – on a tributory note. She said that geeks are key to the survival of folks like her – activists involved in the non-profit sector working for progressive social change. The work of geeks – their various tools, programs, apps, whatever – acts as a conduit for the things social justice activists are dreaming of, imagining and planning for.

One of her central points, and an underlying theme of her talk was this: technology only works if there’s a huge loving idea behind it. The problem, or sticking point, is that geeks don’t think of it this when actually developing the stuff. Adrienne’s message: don’t sell yourself short – you are the Justice League!

I thought it charming and refreshing that this self-described “wannabe geek” was throwing down w/some who are arguably hard core techs. Her presentation was lo-tech – no power point (or mac alt) but notes in a “cool” book that she referred to on occasion to ensure she wasn’t rambling. But even if (or when) she did ramble – it was highly entertaining. That girl is fun-ny! Even her invocation of Jesus was a yuk, surprisingly.

Another main idea of Adrienne’s talk was the need for integration (or interoperability?)- of social change software in the non-profit sector, in order for the sustainability of progressive organizing. So, techs, stop function in “silos” and start talking to each other.

One of the most resonant points of Adrienne’s talk, however, was the need for a theory of how change actually happens. We need to have one. And in thinking about this, organizers need to consider some crucial points:

1. Impacted communities are the ones who create change. Often social change activists are “do gooders” – we put ourselves in the position where we try to do good for impacted communities. BUT revolution is a personal thing that happens in your heart; people come together when something big happens, and people are deeply affected.

2. Invest in people not necessarily resources.
It’s about moving people from a state of lack to a state of abundance, from needing to doing, from aloofness to leadership .

Despite the term “open source”, things aren’t always so open. Free software philosophy is not always practiced – we need to practice the change we want to see in the world. Share.

A closing point Adrienne made was this: We can’t expect to use the tools of the oppressor and expect a different outcome; that’s just dumb (her words)!! So what does this mean for techs? Build a new world through building a new technology. Developers are creating the systems by which we interact w/each other – this is powerful – let’s make something new! Not just a single killer app, but an integrated, holistic system that changes power dynamics, social relations – the whole thang.

Check out the rest of the posts on the Web of Change site — there are numerous interesting reportbacks on the site currently.

I’m excited about all this in so many ways, and this is personal, too, as I’m involved in two current projects (minus the pipe dreams in my head) related to health/medicine and health justice. I’m currently working with others on a subcommittee on web/technology for the wonderful National Physicians Alliance, and we’re trying to revamp the current site to become more interactive, more democratic/two-way, and more fun for those passionate about the issues that the NPA works on. That’s going to take up a bulk of my time in the coming months. The other project has moved officially from the “pipe dream” category to the “this is going to happen damnit, real soon, real soon…” category and involves a huge community of health justice folks. Both projects involve loving ideas and loving people behind them (see? project number two can’t still be a pipe dream if there are others working on it too!)

(this post cross-posted on To the Teeth)

tbell calorie counterThis evening i spent some time trying to update the programs on my Sony Clie NX80 PDA to better assist me in the hospital. I was checking out some freeware and came across the taco bell calorie counter! Now I can switch up my order at the drive thru window after reflecting on how many calories my 7 layer burrito contains. Or, I can show a patient how his 2600 calorie taco bell diet is hindering him from losing weight. Oh, the uses of this application!

…sh** is real. Whoever said the kids don’t care? More than 26,000 students in 52 school districts in the LA USD walked out today to protest the anti-immigration bill HR 4437. This from JC:

Today I was subbing at Jefferson High and the school adminstrators there were much more lax with the students walking out. They let many of them walk out and locked the door on some of them. However, they may be punished upon their return to school tomorrow.

I just watched the channel 2 news and they said 26,000 students walked out and that every middle school and high school in LAUSD is going to be on lockdown tomorrow.

And for the kicker:

I heard from my housemate that all the students from different schools met downtown and some of them actually managed to block the freeway!! I was attempting to drive through downtown this afternoon and saw some people protesting and a lot of cops. I heard that many students are communicating through flyering and through my space.

Did you hear that? Communicating through flyering and through My Space! I love the web 2.o and all its potential for resistance.

I’ve gotta get some sleep now, long day tomorrow, but I will share, in the near future, some of my amazing experiences from my month of obstetrics (delivering babies, working with pregnant women, etc). In the meantime, check out Pandora. Fuckin’ awesome.

You enter in the name of a favorite artist or track, and it plays song after song by artists who produce similar music. AND, along the way, if you really like an artist or song that you’re listening to, you can tweak the radio station to play more songs like IT. holla!

spread the love. man, that’s how I’ve broadened my music interests and collection to where it is now — by listening to artists who created similar music to artists i liked (or performed ‘with’ artists i liked). And now Pandora does that work for you, of finding musicians you’ll like. It’s got serious potential for makin’ dough, and i don’t know how long it’ll be a free service, but i’m hooked for now.

Thanks to down on the brown side for the heads up about Pandora and for referring to it as “intuitive radio” (and for linking to losanjalis) :>

Yesterday evening I was on a conference call with a few other folks, learning how to update or modify the website of a new organization that I’m stoked to be a part of. The duo who created the website took us through a neat tour of the content-driven web publishing software — Expression Engine. I was so insanely excited about how easy it was for the average joe to pick this stuff up — I know i’ve been blogging for a few years, but the others who hadn’t seemed to pick it up really quickly. The interface is beautiful and so easy to use. This is the stuff of technology for the masses, I thought. Everyday I find myself more and more amazed at the possibilities — that anyone with an internet connection can post their thoughts on a blog, or can create a fully functional content-driven website.

I just read an article in the Village Voice, on the phenomenon of celebrity DJs. Madonna supposedly djed somewhere in NYC and just stood there behind the turntables while someone else did the mixing. The writer’s friend totally thought Madonna DJed the event (yikes). No respect for DJs man, no respect. Anyway, something else caught my eye in the article — Carlos D spits some venom about “real” djing vs well… non-vinyl djing:

“DJ’ing doesn’t have any meaning to me unless I’m taking a piece of plastic out of a paper sleeve and plopping it down on a turntable and manually putting it on,” says Carlos D., explaining why he refuses to spin anything but vinyl. “The fact that I have it on vinyl means that I spent a lot of time cultivating it over the years. When you start DJ’ing from an iPod, the only story that you’re telling is that you may have gotten this in the past 24 hours from iTunes. When you have vinyl, you’re telling a much, much more epic story.”

An epic story? Like the Ramayana? What’s the difference between playing music you got in the last 24 hours and your music from your epic collection? I’m losing you, carlos d. I mean I understand that vinyl’s expensive and all, and it sucks to build a collection and nurse it for years just to have some new technology, be it CD dj players or iPods, come into the mix, allowing more folks to DJ for less overhead. Lots of folks use final scratch — does that qualify as real djing? I mean you ARE djing with a piece of “vinyl”, it’s just that it’s an electronicly configured piece of vinyl that plays any ipod or cd music you may have in your collection. But even if you’re not — even if you’re using CD mixers or iPod mixers — if you can beatmatch, scratch, or use other skills to mix up music from your cds or ipods, more power to you. I’ve also seen my share of djs who use vinyl and don’t mix beats or creatively use their music — that’s less talent and creativity to me than someone using just mp3s but mixing with some gusto and skillz.

Now software or mixers that automatically do beat synchronization or automatically mix beats — that’s a bit of cheating. Not cool, unless you wear a sign on your forehead saying you’re using this shortcut.

Anyway — blogging, content-driven websites, anyman/woman djing — rocks. It’s technology for the masses, and it’s fuckin’ beautiful.